Quantcast

Kendall County Times

Monday, November 25, 2024

Oswego Community Unit School District 308 met October 17

Meeting 04

Oswego Community Unit School District 308 met October 17.

Here is the minutes as provided by the committee:

I. Meeting called to order at 5:38 p.m. by Board of Education Member and


    Committee Co-Chair Heather Moyer

    Members in Attendance: Heather Moyer – Board Member & Co-Chair, Dr. Lisa Smith

    – Associate Superintendent for Educational Services, Laura Bankowski, Candace Fikis

    (entered at 5:41), Tina Gonzalez, Toia Jones, Linda Long (left meeting at 6:42), Dr.

     Patti Marcinko, Dr. Debra McDougle, Beth Meier, Yanhong Ochs

     Guests in Attendance: Shannon Lueders, Director of Junior High Education; Jamie

     Max, Director of High School Education; Melissa McDowell, Director of Elementary

     Education

     Members Absent: Jared Ploger – Board Member & Co-Chair, Kelly Hastings, Eulalia

      Valdez

     Recording Secretary: Cindi Krachtus

II. Motion was made to approve the September 19, 2017 meeting minutes by Heather

     Moyer; seconded by Toia Jones; all were in favor.

           Clarification regarding “placed” and “promoted” into the next level was

               asked

               o Director of Junior High Education explained the difference and

                  indicated that it is not currently a practice in the district

III. Social Promotion – Jamie Max, Shannon Lueders and Melissa McDowell

           Follow-up from the September 19, 2017 meeting for clarification purposes: the

              position that existed 8-10 years ago in the district was that of a Behavioral

               Specialist/Interventionist

           Ms. McDowell, discussed with the committee The Pyramid of Support packet

             (attached) and indicated that tonight this committee would be focusing on the

              academic side of the MTSS triangle and the various tiers of supports that are

              available.

           Classroom supports are provided on a daily basis in Tier I, documented by

              teachers and communicated at conferences (elementary); students advocate

             for themselves (secondary)

           Tiers II and III, a MTSS team would document through a MTSS form and a

              success plan is formed which can be monitored

            Interventions

                EC/Elementary – interventions listed by the various Tiers and the

                    interventions, especially for ELA, target a specific skill

                      Intervention resources are provided to every building

                      Some Tier III interventions are replacement program options

                      Tier II – Wilson (at Junior High level) available after January;

                          currently offered in one building

                       Constantly looking for resources for bilingual

                Junior High

                      ELA and Math Foundation is core curriculum

                      Direct I is SpEd class, but is core curriculum

                      Not much change between foundational level and Tier I

                       Tier II Intervention would be in addition to their regular course

                       There are exit and entrance monitoring through STAR, so the

                            student doesn’t necessarily stay in these interventions all year

                       Intervention study hall – no curriculum, teachers focus on

                           executive function/organization of the student

                               Teachers don’t necessarily know what the students are

                                   struggling with when they are assigned to the study hall

                               Perhaps document through the notes section in MTSS

                                   what the student is receiving supports for in order to

                                   better receive support in the study hall

                       Tier III – Replacement curriculum

                       The interventions would take the place of the two electives

                            offered

                        Literacy interventions are looked at for the social studies and

                            science students who are struggling; math is also looked at for

                            the science students struggling as well

                   Tier II and Tier III students are constantly being progress monitored to

                       see how they are progressing (2-3 weeks)

                    MTSS is for both levels – for low-achieving students as well as for highachieving

                       students who need more supports and enrichment

          Question/Comments:

           What role does AVID play in MTSS?

                  Elementary is more grade/schoolwide

                  Each JH is working toward schoolwide AVID

                  System of support to move students in the middle to help them access

                      honor courses, organize

                  Brief discussion of overview of AVID was held

                          Future meeting: AVID

                   Elementary level question:

                          Spanish speakers/dual language – A student is struggling and

                             needs English assistance, does the students get assistance in

                             English or Spanish?

                                     This is being looked at with the Director of EL and she

                                        has indicated that we would provide intervention in

                                        Spanish and as they move up to where they are

                                        speaking more 50/50, their supports could then come in

                                        English (or Spanish)

                  High School:

                         Interventions offered are similar to the junior high

                         Guided study halls/Freshman Seminars opposite of lunch (very

                             short period – 20 mins.)

                         Not enough staff coverage

             Questions/Comments:

              What/where are the gaps?

                        Interventions are constantly being looked at and looked for

                        More staff would be required to provide smaller intervention/study

                            groups

               High School Math –

                        Last year OE used guided studies and freed up a couple of math

                           teachers during 4th, 5th, 6th. Student grades were reviewed and

                            teachers made recommendations for the Algebra 1 (and some

                           geometry) students to go to a required Math Tutoring focus time during

                           guided study time/lunch and work with Alpha Beta Math students, NHS

                           students. It was “strongly recommended” that the students attend this

                           for four weeks and then their grades were re-evaluated. Results from

                            this program proved to be successful. OE was not able to run this

                            program again this year due to scheduling and staffing; however, OH

                             was able to work it into their schedule.

              MTSS Interventionist

                      Will be discussed at next meeting

              Academic Requirements

                       Will be discussed at next meeting

              Policy 6:280 Grading and Promotion

                       Will be discussed at next meeting

IV. Standards Based Grading – Melissa McDowell

             Article on Standards-Based Grading was handed out and referenced on why

                school districts are starting to or have already shifted to this method of grading

             2017 Traditional Report Card was handed out. The committee was asked the

                 following questions with regard to it:

                       What would you learn about your child if this was his/her report card?

                       How or what would you do to support him/her at home?

             2017 Standards Based Report Card that is currently being used at SD308 was

               handed out; however, it was indicated that it is a pdf file only and has to be

               printed and mailed home in a report card envelope

                       The committee agreed that this report card was much easier and

                            comprehensive to read

                       It was explained that the “E” indicator represents that the standard is to

                          be mastered by the end of the year

                       If standard is not being worked on in that semester, it is blacked out

             Ms. McDowell gave a presentation on Standards Based Grading (see attached

                presentation)

                      Purpose of grading and reporting: In SD308 our primary purpose for

                         grading and reporting is to communicate growth towards proficiency of

                         targeted learning standards.

                      Homework for Grades, Zeroes, Redoes/Retakes, Extra Credit,

                          Attendance, Participation, Behavior – these can all be reflected on the

                          report card, but should not be reflected in the student’s overall grade

                           when using standards based grading

                     Discussion currently being held regarding whether to send home report

                        cards on a Trimester or Quarterly basis

                     Option 1 and Option 2 of Mastery Connect Standard Based Grading

                        Summary Report Cards were handed out (attached)

                              Both could be sent out electronically via email unless it is

                                   requested that a hard copy be sent home.

                              Option 2 appears to be more overwhelming to interpret/read,

                                  especially if one was not to access the Mastery Connect portal

                                  to view the assessments and the levels of mastery while viewing

                                 the report

                     Behavior /learning characteristics will be built in. Instead of it being a

                         “standard”, it will be a “skill” and would default to mastery. If a student’s

                         behavior/learning characteristics would need to be changed or worked

                          on, the teacher would check that skill.

                     Text boxes can be added for an area for teachers to add “Teacher

                         Comments” onto the report cards

                     Phase-in timeline: K-5 of Standards Based Grading

V. Curriculum Review Cycle

       A draft of an updated version of the Curriculum Review Cycle that was

           discussed at the September 19, 2017 Teaching and Learning Advisory

           Committee meeting was handed out

                    Dr. Smith explained to the committee that changes to the formatting of

                       the document had taken place since the last meeting to indicate to the

                        board that certain curriculum reviews have been stopped

      Questions/Comments:

       Question was asked regarding school fees and why there isn’t enough money

          for new curriculum when fees are being paid for a public school

                   Lab fees are charged for certain classes that stand alone from

                      registration fees

                  It was suggested that in May, when students sign up for classes, to

                      keep a tally of what classes and fees will be charged and send a

                       communication indicating: In “x” month, you will be billed for “x” fees.

VI. Public Comment (3 minutes each) - none

VII. The meeting was adjourned at 7:42 by Heather Moyer; seconded by Dr. Marcinko;

        all were in favor.

Next Meeting: November 14, 2017

https://www.sd308.org/site/handlers/filedownload.ashx?moduleinstanceid=9955&dataid=44129&FileName=Teaching%20and%20Learning%20Committee%20Minutes%2010.17.17.pdf